        {"id":2522,"date":"2024-05-31T13:49:59","date_gmt":"2024-05-31T11:49:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.glc.us.es\/~jalonso\/calculemus\/?p=2522"},"modified":"2024-05-31T14:01:57","modified_gmt":"2024-05-31T12:01:57","slug":"31-may-24","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.glc.us.es\/~jalonso\/calculemus\/31-may-24\/","title":{"rendered":"Si (\u2200n)[u\u2099 \u2264 v\u2099], entonces lim u\u2099 \u2264 lim v\u2099"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>En Lean4, una sucesi\u00f3n &#92;(u_0, u_1, u_2, &#92;dots&#92;) se puede representar mediante una funci\u00f3n &#92;(u : \u2115 \u2192 \u211d&#92;) de forma que &#92;(u(n)&#92;) es el &#92;(n&#92;)-\u00e9simo t\u00e9rmino de la sucesi\u00f3n.<\/p>\n<p>Se define que &#92;(a&#92;) l\u00edmite de la sucesi\u00f3n &#92;(u&#92;) como sigue<\/p>\n<pre lang=\"isar\">\n   def limite (u : \u2115 \u2192 \u211d) (c : \u211d) :=\n     \u2200 \u03b5 > 0, \u2203 k, \u2200 n \u2265 k, |u n - c| < \u03b5\n<\/pre>\n<p>Demostrar que si &#92;((\u2200 n)[u_n \u2264 v_n]&#92;), &#92;(a&#92;) es l\u00edmite de &#92;(u_n&#92;) y &#92;(c&#92;) es l\u00edmite de &#92;(v_n&#92;), entonces &#92;(a \u2264 c&#92;).<\/p>\n<p>Para ello, completar la siguiente teor\u00eda de Lean4:<\/p>\n<pre lang=\"lean\">\nimport Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic\n\nvariable (u v : \u2115 \u2192 \u211d)\nvariable (a c : \u211d)\n\ndef limite (u : \u2115 \u2192 \u211d) (c : \u211d) :=\n  \u2200 \u03b5 > 0, \u2203 k, \u2200 n \u2265 k, |u n - c| < \u03b5\n\nexample\n  (hu : limite u a)\n  (hv : limite v c)\n  (huv : \u2200 n, u n \u2264 v n)\n  : a \u2264 c :=\nby sorry\n<\/pre>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<h2>1. Demostraci\u00f3n en lenguaje natural<\/h2>\n<p>Por reduccion al absurdo. Supongamos que &#92;(a \u2270 c&#92;). Entonces,<br \/>\n&#92;[ c &lt; a &#92;tag{1} &#92;]<br \/>\nSea<br \/>\n&#92;[ \u03b5 = &#92;frac{a - c}{2} &#92;tag{2} &#92;]<br \/>\nPor (1),<br \/>\n&#92;[ \u03b5 > 0 &#92;]<br \/>\nPor tanto, puesto que &#92;(a&#92;) es l\u00edmite de &#92;(u_n&#92;), existe un &#92;(p \u2208 \u2115&#92;) tal que<br \/>\n&#92;[ (\u2200 n)[n \u2265 p \u2192 |u_n - a| &lt; \u03b5] &#92;tag{3} &#92;]<br \/>\nAn\u00e1logamente, puesto que c es l\u00edmite de &#92;(v_n&#92;), existe un &#92;(q \u2208 \u2115&#92;) tal que<br \/>\n&#92;[ (\u2200 n)[n \u2265 q \u2192 |v_n - c| &lt; \u03b5] &#92;tag{4} &#92;]<br \/>\nSea<br \/>\n&#92;[ k = &#92;max(p, q) &#92;]<br \/>\nEntonces, &#92;(k \u2265 p&#92;) y, por (3),<br \/>\n&#92;[ |u_k - a| &lt; \u03b5 &#92;tag{5} &#92;]<br \/>\nAn\u00e1logamente, &#92;(k \u2265 q&#92;) y, por (4),<br \/>\n&#92;[ |v_k - c| &lt; \u03b5 &#92;tag{6} &#92;]<br \/>\nAdem\u00e1s, por la hip\u00f3tesis,<br \/>\n&#92;[ u_k \u2264 v_k &#92;tag{7} &#92;]<br \/>\nPor tanto,<br \/>\n&#92;begin{align}<br \/>\n   a - c &amp;= (a - u_k) + (u_k - c)      &#92;&#92;<br \/>\n         &amp;\u2264 (a - u_k) + (v_k - c)      &amp;&amp;&#92;text{[por (7)]} &#92;&#92;<br \/>\n         &amp;\u2264 |(a - u_k) + (v_k - c)|    &#92;&#92;<br \/>\n         &amp;\u2264 |a - u_k| + |v_k - c|      &#92;&#92;<br \/>\n         &amp;= |u_k - a| + |v_k - c|      &#92;&#92;<br \/>\n         &amp;&lt; \u03b5 + \u03b5                      &amp;&amp;&#92;text{[por (5) y (6)]} &#92;&#92;<br \/>\n         &amp;= a - c                      &amp;&amp;&#92;text{[por (2)]}<br \/>\n&#92;end{align}<br \/>\nLuego,<br \/>\n&#92;[ a - c &lt; a - c &#92;]<br \/>\nque es una contradicci\u00f3n.<\/p>\n<h2>2. Demostraciones con Lean4<\/h2>\n<pre lang=\"lean\">\nimport Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic\n\nvariable (u v : \u2115 \u2192 \u211d)\nvariable (a c : \u211d)\n\ndef limite (u : \u2115 \u2192 \u211d) (c : \u211d) :=\n  \u2200 \u03b5 > 0, \u2203 k, \u2200 n \u2265 k, |u n - c| < \u03b5\n\n-- 1\u00aa demostraci\u00f3n\n-- ===============\n\nexample\n  (hu : limite u a)\n  (hv : limite v c)\n  (huv : \u2200 n, u n \u2264 v n)\n  : a \u2264 c :=\nby\n  by_contra h\n  -- h : \u00aca \u2264 c\n  -- \u22a2 False\n  have hca : c < a := not_le.mp h\n  set \u03b5 := (a - c) \/2\n  have h\u03b5 : 0 < \u03b5 := half_pos (sub_pos.mpr hca)\n  obtain \u27e8ku, hku : \u2200 n, n \u2265 ku \u2192 |u n - a| < \u03b5\u27e9 := hu \u03b5 h\u03b5\n  obtain \u27e8kv, hkv : \u2200 n, n \u2265 kv \u2192 |v n - c| < \u03b5\u27e9 := hv \u03b5 h\u03b5\n  let k := max ku kv\n  have hku' : ku \u2264 k := le_max_left ku kv\n  have hkv' : kv \u2264 k := le_max_right ku kv\n  have ha : |u k - a| < \u03b5 := hku k hku'\n  have hc : |v k - c| < \u03b5 := hkv k hkv'\n  have hk : u k - c \u2264 v k - c := sub_le_sub_right (huv k) c\n  have hac1 : a - c < a - c := by\n    calc a - c\n         = (a - u k) + (u k - c)   := by ring\n       _ \u2264 (a - u k) + (v k - c)   := add_le_add_left hk (a - u k)\n       _ \u2264 |(a - u k) + (v k - c)| := le_abs_self ((a - u k) + (v k - c))\n       _ \u2264 |a - u k| + |v k - c|   := abs_add (a - u k) (v k - c)\n       _ = |u k - a| + |v k - c|   := by simp only [abs_sub_comm]\n       _ < \u03b5 + \u03b5                   := add_lt_add ha hc\n       _ = a - c                   := add_halves (a - c)\n  have hac2 : \u00ac a - c < a -c := lt_irrefl (a - c)\n  show False\n  exact hac2 hac1\n\n-- 2\u00aa demostraci\u00f3n\n-- ===============\n\nexample\n  (hu : limite u a)\n  (hv : limite v c)\n  (huv : \u2200 n, u n \u2264 v n)\n  : a \u2264 c :=\nby\n  by_contra h\n  -- h : \u00aca \u2264 c\n  -- \u22a2 False\n  have hca : c < a := not_le.mp h\n  set \u03b5 := (a - c) \/2 with h\u03b5\n  obtain \u27e8ku, hku : \u2200 n, n \u2265 ku \u2192 |u n - a| < \u03b5\u27e9 := hu \u03b5 (by linarith)\n  obtain \u27e8kv, hkv : \u2200 n, n \u2265 kv \u2192 |v n - c| < \u03b5\u27e9 := hv \u03b5 (by linarith)\n  let k := max ku kv\n  have ha : |u k - a| < \u03b5 := hku k (le_max_left ku kv)\n  have hc : |v k - c| < \u03b5 := hkv k (le_max_right ku kv)\n  have hk : u k - c \u2264 v k - c := sub_le_sub_right (huv k) c\n  have hac1 : a - c < a -c := by\n    calc a - c\n         = (a - u k) + (u k - c)   := by ring\n       _ \u2264 (a - u k) + (v k - c)   := add_le_add_left hk (a - u k)\n       _ \u2264 |(a - u k) + (v k - c)| := le_abs_self ((a - u k) + (v k - c))\n       _ \u2264 |a - u k| + |v k - c|   := abs_add (a - u k) (v k - c)\n       _ = |u k - a| + |v k - c|   := by simp only [abs_sub_comm]\n       _ < \u03b5 + \u03b5                   := add_lt_add ha hc\n       _ = a - c                   := add_halves (a - c)\n  have hac2 : \u00ac a - c < a -c := lt_irrefl (a - c)\n  show False\n  exact hac2 hac1\n\n-- 3\u00aa demostraci\u00f3n\n-- ===============\n\nexample\n  (hu : limite u a)\n  (hv : limite v c)\n  (huv : \u2200 n, u n \u2264 v n)\n  : a \u2264 c :=\nby\n  by_contra h\n  -- h : \u00aca \u2264 c\n  -- \u22a2 False\n  have hca : c < a := not_le.mp h\n  set \u03b5 := (a - c) \/2 with h\u03b5\n  obtain \u27e8ku, hku : \u2200 n, n \u2265 ku \u2192 |u n - a| < \u03b5\u27e9 := hu \u03b5 (by linarith)\n  obtain \u27e8kv, hkv : \u2200 n, n \u2265 kv \u2192 |v n - c| < \u03b5\u27e9 := hv \u03b5 (by linarith)\n  let k := max ku kv\n  have ha : |u k - a| < \u03b5 := hku k (le_max_left ku kv)\n  have hc : |v k - c| < \u03b5 := hkv k (le_max_right ku kv)\n  have hk : u k - c \u2264 v k - c := sub_le_sub_right (huv k) c\n  have hac1 : a - c < a -c := by\n    calc a - c\n         = (a - u k) + (u k - c)   := by ring\n       _ \u2264 (a - u k) + (v k - c)   := add_le_add_left hk (a - u k)\n       _ \u2264 |(a - u k) + (v k - c)| := by simp [le_abs_self]\n       _ \u2264 |a - u k| + |v k - c|   := by simp [abs_add]\n       _ = |u k - a| + |v k - c|   := by simp [abs_sub_comm]\n       _ < \u03b5 + \u03b5                   := add_lt_add ha hc\n       _ = a - c                   := by simp\n  have hac2 : \u00ac a - c < a -c := lt_irrefl (a - c)\n  show False\n  exact hac2 hac1\n\n-- 4\u00aa demostraci\u00f3n\n-- ===============\n\nexample\n  (hu : limite u a)\n  (hv : limite v c)\n  (huv : \u2200 n, u n \u2264 v n)\n  : a \u2264 c :=\nby\n  apply le_of_not_lt\n  -- \u22a2 \u00acc < a\n  intro hca\n  -- hca : c < a\n  -- \u22a2 False\n  set \u03b5 := (a - c) \/2 with h\u03b5\n  cases' hu \u03b5 (by linarith) with ku hku\n  -- ku : \u2115\n  -- hku : \u2200 (n : \u2115), n \u2265 ku \u2192 |u n - a| < \u03b5\n  cases' hv \u03b5 (by linarith) with kv hkv\n  -- kv : \u2115\n  -- hkv : \u2200 (n : \u2115), n \u2265 kv \u2192 |v n - c| < \u03b5\n  let k := max ku kv\n  have ha : |u k - a| < \u03b5 := hku k (le_max_left ku kv)\n  have hc : |v k - c| < \u03b5 := hkv k (le_max_right ku kv)\n  have hk : u k \u2264 v k := huv k\n  apply lt_irrefl (a - c)\n  -- \u22a2 a - c < a - c\n  rw [abs_lt] at ha hc\n  -- ha : -\u03b5 < u k - a \u2227 u k - a < \u03b5\n  -- hc : -\u03b5 < v k - c \u2227 v k - c < \u03b5\n  linarith\n\n-- Lemas usados\n-- ============\n\n-- variable (b d : \u211d)\n-- #check (abs_add a b : |a + b| \u2264 |a| + |b|)\n-- #check (abs_lt: |a| < b \u2194 -b < a \u2227 a < b)\n-- #check (abs_sub_comm a b : |a - b| = |b - a|)\n-- #check (add_halves a : a \/ 2 + a \/ 2 = a)\n-- #check (add_le_add_left : b \u2264 c \u2192 \u2200 a, a + b \u2264 a + c)\n-- #check (add_lt_add : a < b \u2192 c < d \u2192 a + c < b + d)\n-- #check (half_pos : 0 < a \u2192 0 < a \/ 2)\n-- #check (le_abs_self a : a \u2264 |a|)\n-- #check (le_max_left a b : a \u2264 max a b)\n-- #check (le_max_right a b : b \u2264 max a b)\n-- #check (le_of_not_lt :  \u00acb < a \u2192 a \u2264 b)\n-- #check (lt_irrefl a : \u00aca < a)\n-- #check (not_le : \u00aca \u2264 b \u2194 b < a)\n-- #check (sub_le_sub_right : a \u2264 b \u2192 \u2200 c, a - c \u2264 b - c)\n-- #check (sub_pos : 0 < a - b \u2194 b < a)\n<\/pre>\n<p>Se puede interactuar con las demostraciones anteriores en <a href=\"https:\/\/live.lean-lang.org\/#url=https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/jaalonso\/Calculemus2\/main\/src\/Limite_de_sucesion_menor_que_otra_sucesion.lean\">Lean 4 Web<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>3. Demostraciones con Isabelle\/HOL<\/h2>\n<pre lang=\"isar\">\ntheory Limite_de_sucesion_menor_que_otra_sucesion\nimports Main HOL.Real\nbegin\n\ndefinition limite :: \"(nat \u21d2 real) \u21d2 real \u21d2 bool\"\n  where \"limite u c \u27f7 (\u2200\u03b5>0. \u2203k::nat. \u2200n\u2265k. \u00a6u n - c\u00a6 < \u03b5)\"\n\n(* 1\u00aa demostraci\u00f3n *)\n\nlemma\n  assumes \"limite u a\"\n          \"limite v c\"\n          \"\u2200n. u n \u2264 v n\"\n  shows   \"a \u2264 c\"\nproof (rule leI ; intro notI)\n  assume \"c < a\"\n  let ?\u03b5 = \"(a - c) \/2\"\n  have \"0 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using \u2039c < a\u203a by simp\n  obtain Nu where HNu : \"\u2200n\u2265Nu. \u00a6u n - a\u00a6 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using assms(1) limite_def \u20390 < ?\u03b5\u203a by blast\n  obtain Nv where HNv : \"\u2200n\u2265Nv. \u00a6v n - c\u00a6 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using assms(2) limite_def \u20390 < ?\u03b5\u203a by blast\n  let ?N = \"max Nu Nv\"\n  have \"?N \u2265 Nu\"\n    by simp\n  then have Ha : \"\u00a6u ?N - a\u00a6 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using HNu by simp\n  have \"?N \u2265 Nv\"\n    by simp\n  then have Hc : \"\u00a6v ?N - c\u00a6 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using HNv by simp\n  have \"a - c < a - c\"\n  proof -\n    have \"a - c = (a - u ?N) + (u ?N - c)\"\n      by simp\n    also have \"\u2026 \u2264 (a - u ?N) + (v ?N - c)\"\n      using assms(3) by auto\n    also have \"\u2026 \u2264 \u00a6(a - u ?N) + (v ?N - c)\u00a6\"\n      by (rule abs_ge_self)\n    also have \"\u2026 \u2264 \u00a6a - u ?N\u00a6 + \u00a6v ?N - c\u00a6\"\n      by (rule abs_triangle_ineq)\n    also have \"\u2026 = \u00a6u ?N - a\u00a6 + \u00a6v ?N - c\u00a6\"\n      by (simp only: abs_minus_commute)\n    also have \"\u2026 < ?\u03b5 + ?\u03b5\"\n      using Ha Hc by (simp only: add_strict_mono)\n    also have \"\u2026 = a - c\"\n      by (rule field_sum_of_halves)\n    finally show \"a - c < a - c\"\n      by this\n  qed\n  have \"\u00ac a - c < a - c\"\n    by (rule less_irrefl)\n  then show False\n    using \u2039a - c < a - c\u203a by (rule notE)\nqed\n\n(* 2\u00aa demostraci\u00f3n *)\n\nlemma\n  assumes \"limite u a\"\n          \"limite v c\"\n          \"\u2200n. u n \u2264 v n\"\n  shows   \"a \u2264 c\"\nproof (rule leI ; intro notI)\n  assume \"c < a\"\n  let ?\u03b5 = \"(a - c) \/2\"\n  have \"0 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using \u2039c < a\u203a by simp\n  obtain Nu where HNu : \"\u2200n\u2265Nu. \u00a6u n - a\u00a6 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using assms(1) limite_def \u20390 < ?\u03b5\u203a by blast\n  obtain Nv where HNv : \"\u2200n\u2265Nv. \u00a6v n - c\u00a6 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using assms(2) limite_def \u20390 < ?\u03b5\u203a by blast\n  let ?N = \"max Nu Nv\"\n  have \"?N \u2265 Nu\"\n    by simp\n  then have Ha : \"\u00a6u ?N - a\u00a6 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using HNu by simp\n  then have Ha' : \"u ?N - a < ?\u03b5 \u2227 -(u ?N - a) < ?\u03b5\"\n    by argo\n  have \"?N \u2265 Nv\"\n    by simp\n  then have Hc : \"\u00a6v ?N - c\u00a6 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using HNv by simp\n  then have Hc' : \"v ?N - c < ?\u03b5 \u2227 -(v ?N - c) < ?\u03b5\"\n    by argo\n  have \"a - c < a - c\"\n    using assms(3) Ha' Hc'\n    by (smt (verit, best) field_sum_of_halves)\n  have \"\u00ac a - c < a - c\"\n    by simp\n  then show False\n    using \u2039a - c < a - c\u203a by simp\nqed\n\n(* 3\u00aa demostraci\u00f3n *)\n\nlemma\n  assumes \"limite u a\"\n          \"limite v c\"\n          \"\u2200n. u n \u2264 v n\"\n  shows   \"a \u2264 c\"\nproof (rule leI ; intro notI)\n  assume \"c < a\"\n  let ?\u03b5 = \"(a - c) \/2\"\n  have \"0 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using \u2039c < a\u203a by simp\n  obtain Nu where HNu : \"\u2200n\u2265Nu. \u00a6u n - a\u00a6 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using assms(1) limite_def \u20390 < ?\u03b5\u203a by blast\n  obtain Nv where HNv : \"\u2200n\u2265Nv. \u00a6v n - c\u00a6 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using assms(2) limite_def \u20390 < ?\u03b5\u203a by blast\n  let ?N = \"max Nu Nv\"\n  have \"?N \u2265 Nu\"\n    by simp\n  then have Ha : \"\u00a6u ?N - a\u00a6 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using HNu by simp\n  then have Ha' : \"u ?N - a < ?\u03b5 \u2227 -(u ?N - a) < ?\u03b5\"\n    by argo\n  have \"?N \u2265 Nv\"\n    by simp\n  then have Hc : \"\u00a6v ?N - c\u00a6 < ?\u03b5\"\n    using HNv by simp\n  then have Hc' : \"v ?N - c < ?\u03b5 \u2227 -(v ?N - c) < ?\u03b5\"\n    by argo\n  show False\n    using assms(3) Ha' Hc'\n    by (smt (verit, best) field_sum_of_halves)\nqed\n\nend\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En Lean4, una sucesi\u00f3n &#92;(u_0, u_1, u_2, &#92;dots&#92;) se puede representar mediante una funci\u00f3n &#92;(u : \u2115 \u2192 \u211d&#92;) de forma que &#92;(u(n)&#92;) es el &#92;(n&#92;)-\u00e9simo t\u00e9rmino de la sucesi\u00f3n. Se define que &#92;(a&#92;) l\u00edmite de la sucesi\u00f3n &#92;(u&#92;) como sigue def limite (u : \u2115 \u2192 \u211d) (c : \u211d) := \u2200 \u03b5 > 0, \u2203 k, \u2200 n \u2265 k, |u n &#8211; c| < \u03b5 Demostrar que si &#92;((\u2200 n)[u_n \u2264 v_n]&#92;), &#92;(a&#92;) es l\u00edmite de &#92;(u_n&#92;) y &#92;(c&#92;) es l\u00edmite de &#92;(v_n&#92;), entonces &#92;(a \u2264 c&#92;). Para ello, completar la siguiente teor\u00eda de Lean4: import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic variable (u v : \u2115 \u2192 \u211d) variable (a c : \u211d) def limite (u : \u2115 \u2192 \u211d) (c : \u211d) := \u2200 \u03b5...\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.glc.us.es\/~jalonso\/calculemus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2522"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.glc.us.es\/~jalonso\/calculemus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.glc.us.es\/~jalonso\/calculemus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glc.us.es\/~jalonso\/calculemus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glc.us.es\/~jalonso\/calculemus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2522"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.glc.us.es\/~jalonso\/calculemus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2522\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2526,"href":"https:\/\/www.glc.us.es\/~jalonso\/calculemus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2522\/revisions\/2526"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.glc.us.es\/~jalonso\/calculemus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glc.us.es\/~jalonso\/calculemus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2522"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.glc.us.es\/~jalonso\/calculemus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}